6.21. Recursion vs. Iteration
In the two previous sections, we studied
two functions that easily can be implemented recursively or iteratively. This
section compares the two approaches and discusses why you might choose one
approach over the other in a particular situation.
Both iteration and recursion are
based on a control statement: Iteration uses a repetition structure; recursion
uses a selection structure. Both iteration and recursion involve repetition:
Iteration explicitly uses a repetition structure; recursion achieves repetition
through repeated function calls. Iteration and recursion both involve a
termination test: Iteration terminates when the loop-continuation condition
fails; recursion terminates when a base case is recognized. Iteration with
counter-controlled repetition and recursion both gradually approach termination:
Iteration modifies a counter until the counter assumes a value that makes the
loop-continuation condition fail; recursion produces simpler versions of the
original problem until the base case is reached. Both iteration and recursion
can occur infinitely: An infinite loop occurs with iteration if the
loop-continuation test never becomes false; infinite recursion occurs if the
recursion step does not reduce the problem during each recursive call in a
manner that converges on the base case.
To illustrate the differences
between iteration and recursion, let us examine an iterative solution to the
factorial problem (Fig.
6.31). Note that a repetition statement is used
(lines 28–29 of Fig.
6.31) rather than the selection statement
of the recursive solution (lines 24–27 of Fig.
6.28). Note that both solutions use a termination test.
In the recursive solution, line 24 tests for the base case. In the iterative
solution, line 28 tests the loop-continuation condition—if the test fails, the
loop terminates. Finally, note that instead of producing simpler versions of the
original problem, the iterative solution uses a counter that is modified until
the loop-continuation condition becomes false.
Fig. 6.31. Iterative factorial solution.
1 // Fig. 6.31: fig06_31.cpp
2 // Testing the iterative factorial function.
3 #include <iostream>
4 using std::cout;
5 using std::endl;
6
7 #include <iomanip>
8 using std::setw;
9
10 unsigned long factorial( unsigned long ); // function prototype
11
12 int main()
13 {
14 // calculate the factorials of 0 through 10
15 for ( int counter = 0; counter <= 10; counter++ )
16 cout << setw( 2 ) << counter << "! = " << factorial( counter )
17 << endl;
18
19 return 0;
20 } // end main
21
22 // iterative function factorial
23 unsigned long factorial( unsigned long number )
24 {
25 unsigned long result = 1;
26
27 // iterative factorial calculation
28 for ( unsigned long i = number; i >= 1; i-- )
29 result *= i;
30
31 return result;
32 } // end function factorial
|
0! = 1
1! = 1
2! = 2
3! = 6
4! = 24
5! = 120
6! = 720
7! = 5040
8! = 40320
9! = 362880
10! = 3628800
|
Recursion has many negatives. It repeatedly invokes
the mechanism, and consequently the overhead, of function calls. This can be
expensive in both processor time and memory space. Each recursive call causes
another copy of the function (actually only the function's variables) to be
created; this can consume considerable memory. Iteration normally occurs within
a function, so the overhead of repeated function calls and extra memory
assignment is omitted. So why choose recursion?
Software Engineering Observation 6.16
|
Any problem
that can be solved recursively can also be solved iteratively (nonrecursively).
A recursive approach is normally chosen in preference to an iterative approach
when the recursive approach more naturally mirrors the problem and results in a
program that is easier to understand and debug. Another reason to choose a
recursive solution is that an iterative solution is not
apparent. |
Performance Tip 6.9
|
Avoid using recursion in
performance situations. Recursive calls take time and consume additional
memory. |
Common Programming Error
6.26
|
Accidentally having a nonrecursive function
call itself, either directly or indirectly (through another function), is a
logic error. |